Liquid Penetrant Testing Level 2 (PT-2) Practice Exam

Question: 1 / 400

What procedure should be followed if indications are observed during PT?

Ignore them and proceed with the next test

Document them and return to check later

Further investigation and evaluation to determine the nature of the indications

When indications are observed during a Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT) procedure, further investigation and evaluation to determine the nature of those indications is the appropriate course of action. This process is crucial because indications can potentially represent surface-breaking defects, such as cracks, porosity, or other discontinuities that may compromise the integrity of the component being tested.

By performing further investigation, the operator can assess the severity and extent of the indications, possibly using additional methods such as magnetic particle testing or visual inspection, to confirm whether these observations indeed point to a defect that requires rectification. This careful analysis helps to ensure that any potential risks to safety or performance are addressed promptly and effectively.

Immediate removal of a defect without proper evaluation may lead to unnecessary material loss or misdiagnosis of surface issues. Similarly, ignoring the indications or merely documenting them for later checks does not address the immediate need for assessment and could risk compromising the reliability and safety of the structure being tested.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Remove the defect immediately

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy